• About Us
  • Contact
  • News
  • RSS Feed
  • Home
  • News
    • Canada
    • International
  • Health & Wellness
    • Spiritual
  • LIBER T Token
  • Cryptocurrency
    • News
    • Market Prices
    • RSS Feed
  • Whistle Tube

The New Yorker’s Grossly Irresponsible Story – Charles Cook, National Review

0

Judge Kavanaugh labels The New Yorker’s report a “smear, plain and simple.” He should be applauded for his restraint. I am struggling to remember reading a less responsible piece of “journalism” in a major outlet.

The piece starts out not with a summary of the story, but with the news that Democrats in Washington are taking it seriously — a weaselly attempt to pass the buck if I ever saw one (“People are saying!”). After that throat clearing, it is acknowledged that the person making the accusation around which the piece revolves had not mentioned it until Kavanaugh was nominated, “was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty,” and agreed to make the charge on the record only after she had spent “six days [] carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney.”

There are no corroborating witnesses. None. Of the “dozens” of classmates The New Yorker contacted, all either failed “to respond to interview requests . . . declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.” Indeed, we learn late in the piece that the authors could not establish that Kavanaugh was even there. “The New Yorker,” the tenth paragraph begins, “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.” The only “evidence” provided comes from a “classmate” who was not at the party, but is certain he heard about the incident, and from “another classmate” who thinks he heard about an incident that could vaguely resemble the one alleged, but doesn’t know to whom it was done, or by whom. Or, as we would traditionally put it: The only proof provided is rumor.

COMMENTS
There are a few quotes from figures who attest to the accuser’s character. And, cutting in the other direction, there is a classmate who suggest that the accuser’s accusation “may have been politically motivated.” But these contributions are so much gossip and should be treated as such. What matters is that there is no scaffolding beneath this story. As the New York Times reports:

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

Which is to say that there is as much corroboration behind this accusation as there was behind the last one: None. In and of itself, this makes The New Yorker’s story irresponsible, albeit not out of character for Jane Mayer. But when one considers that the forces arrayed against Kavanaugh’s nomination have taken to arguing that the mere existence of an unsubstantiated allegation should be sufficient to cause a withdrawal . . . well, it looks reckless beyond all reason.

Which may, of course, have been exactly the point.

Post Views: 44
Tweet
Share
Pin
Share
0 Shares

Follow admin on Twitter

TRENDING TODAY

Prince Charles tests positive for coronavirus

wwnn.com

‘Covid-19 could be seasonal’: Fauci warns coronavirus is likely to return in ‘CYCLES’, stresses need for vaccine

wwnn.com

Decadent like the late Roman Empire, the West is committing suicide through its irrational response to Covid-19

wwnn.com

Swiss hotel offers luxury quarantine package including $500 coronavirus test

wwnn.com

Billion-plus Indians under lockdown as virus delays Olympics

wwnn.com

“This Is A War” – 2,000 National Guardsmen Mobilized To Help Battle Coronavirus As Confirmed Cases Pass 10k: Live Updates

wwnn.com

Covid-19 pandemic has spawned another epidemic, of incessant celebrity attention-seeking

wwnn.com

Amazon, Microsoft, ‘putting world at risk of killer AI’: study

wwnn.com

Scientists Warn “Geoengineering” Could Start WW3

wwnn.com

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

WWNN CONNECT

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Enter your email here:
Loading
You may like

‘Near collision’: Leaked photos show Chinese ship chasing away US destroyer in South China Sea

Amazon eliminates monthly bonuses and stock grants after minimum wage increase

Sting Operation Active,The Coverup,Comms Active – 22 x report

Want to Delete Your Facebook Account? You Must Now Wait 30 Days

Most Popular

Why Is The Mainstream Media Telling Us That A Giant West Coast Tsunami “Might Hit Without Warning”?

Published: Oct 08, 2018

Coming Financial Crisis Much Bigger than 2008

Published: Oct 08, 2018

The winners and losers in the new NAFTA

Published: Oct 08, 2018

Trudeau ‘backed down to Donald Trump’ on USMCA: Scheer

Published: Oct 08, 2018
FROM THE HOMEPAGE

Anti-aging game changer: Scientists successfully ‘reset’ cells from 114yo ‘supercentenarian’

0

Prince Charles tests positive for coronavirus

0

‘Covid-19 could be seasonal’: Fauci warns coronavirus is likely to return in ‘CYCLES’, stresses need for vaccine

0

Decadent like the late Roman Empire, the West is committing suicide through its irrational response to Covid-19

0

No corona for you: French local authority bans ALCOHOL sales amid virus lockdown

0

Subscribe to our email newsletter

Enter your email here:
Loading

Follow Us

  • Home
  • World Events
  • CANADA
  • Politics
  • Health & Wellness
  • LIBER T Token
  • Crypto & Currency
  • Spiritual
  • Whistle Tube
© 2018 WWNN. All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • News
  • RSS Feed
  • PRIVACY POLICY / Fair Use Disclaimer